Page 49 -

โครงการรวบรวมและจัดทําวารสารอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์
วารสารวนศาสตร 34 (1) : 39-47 (2558) 47
์

Elliott, S. 2000. Defining forest restoration Thongpamnak, P., W. Thongdonae, A. Kongton
for wildlife conservation. pp 13- and K. Poonsub. 2000. Seed Coating
17. In S. Elliott, J. Kerby, D. for Organic Farming. Laboratory
Blakesley, K. Hardwick, K. Woods and greenhouse experiments, Kasetsart
and V. Anusarnsunthorn, eds. Forest university research and development
Restoration for Wildlife Conservation. institute, Kamphaeng Saen campus,

Chiang Mai University. Chiang Mai. Nakhonpathom. (in Thai)
Hanssan, Z.A., S.D. Young, C. Hepburn and Tunjai, P. 2006. Direct Seeding as an
R. Arizal. 1990. An evaluation of Alternative to Tree Planting
urea-rubber matrics as slow-release for Restoring Degraded Forest
fertilizers. Fertilizer Research 22: Ecosystems: A Comparison between
63-70. Deciduous and Evergreen Forest
Powell, A.A. and S. Mathews. 1988. Seed Types. M.S. Thesis, Chiang Mai
treatments: development and prospects. University. (in Thai)
Outlook on Agriculture 17: 93-103. Vongkumjun, S. 2003. Propagation of
Royal Forest Department. 2002. Seed Quality Native Forest Tree Species for
and Seed Sources Development of Forest restoration in Doi Suthep-
Forest Tree: Publication of Silviculture Pui National Park. Ph.D. Thesis,
Volume 2. Bangkok. (in Thai) Chiang Mai Universit