Page 12 -
P. 12

โครงการหนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ด้านการเกษตร เฉลิมพระเกียรติพระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว






                 water sources. The differences among the policies lie in implementation or development of action
                 plans, which were not able to implement every issue stated in the policies due to various factors. Such
                 policies also change, subjective to the decisions of subsequent governments. As a result, water policies
                 are not unified, and various problems accumulate over time. Consequently, the three water problems
                 persist until today and are likely to worsen in the future.

                 Outcomes of past policies
                        Thailand’s past water policies have not resolved key water resources problems in the country.
                 This  is  because  the  policies  are  not  unified  and  not  continuous.  It  is  also  because  of  the  water
                 management structure, which includes organizations that manage water resources, policy committees,
                 relevant laws, and water database systems. Currently, as many as 29 organizations under 10 ministries
                 and  local  governments  are  in  charge  of  managing  water  resources  and  other  related  activities  in
                 Thailand from the upstream, midstream, and downstream areas. These many agencies all operate
                 under  their  specific  laws  without  integrating  their  efforts  together.  Without  an  agency  that  would
                 function  specifically  as  the  platform  for  developing  a  common  plan,  there  are  overlapping  and
                 conflicting functions among these organizations. Meanwhile, a number of policy committees have been
                 established by many, and continuously changing, versions of the Order of the Office of the Prime
                 Minister  and  the  Regulations  of  the  Office  of  the  Prime  Minister.  Currently,  the  National  Water
                 Resources Committee is the policy-level committee, which was established by the Order of the Office
                 of  the  Prime  Minister.  The  chairperson  of  the  committee  is  the  Prime  Minister,  with  the  Director-
                 General of the Department of Water Resources serving as the secretariat.
                        There  are  currently  32  laws  relating  to  water  resources  management  in  Thailand.  The
                 objectives  of  the  laws  include  controlling  and  regulating  water  use  in  agriculture,  consumption,
                 manufacturing industry, energy industry, transportation, conservation, pollution control, etc. But the
                 current laws are found to face management problems, as they are not unified, overlapping with one
                 another,  and  outdated.  There  are  also  legal  loopholes.  To  rectify  these  problems,  a  new  Water
                 Resources  Act  has  been  proposed  to  serve  as  the  main  law  for  water  resources  management  in
                 Thailand since B.E. 2536. But the law has failed to produce the intended outcomes. Currently, two bills
                 are separately proposed by the Department of Water Resources and the National Reform Council. The
                 review process by the government is ongoing.
                        Regarding the water database system, there are currently several agencies that compile water
                 resources databases, but there are a number of problems, particularly in regard to public acceptance.
                 Recently, the National Water Resources Committee had a resolution in June B.E. 2559 to revise the Act
                 on the Establishment of the Hydro and Agro Informatics Institute (Public Organization) to serve as the
                 national “data bank” for water and climate.
                        Thailand’s water management systems and tools from the past until now face 10 problems:
                 (1) lack of unified policies, (2) lack of master plans, (3) lack of main laws, (4) many relevant agencies
                 without coordination, (5) lack of public participation and decentralization, (6) budget allocation by line
                 agencies, (7) lack of information linkages among agencies and inadequate body of knowledge, (8) river
                 basin organizations do not have adequate capabilities and are often rife with conflicts, (9) political
                 parties are weak and impose conditions for negotiation, and (10) lack of tools to allocate water and
                 rights to use water.



                                                            ญ
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17