Page 92 -
P. 92
โครงการหนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ด้านการเกษตร เฉลิมพระเกียรติพระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว
Boonyanam, N. (2016). Agricultural Policy Misspecification in Thailand. SOUTHEAST ASIAN
Journal of Economics, 4(1), 29-57.
Carter, Michael R. (1984). "Identification of the Inverse Relationship between Farm Size
and Productivity: An Empirical Analysis of Peasant Agricultural Production." Oxford
Economic Papers 36 (1): 131-45.
Carter, M., & Salgado, R. (2001). Land market liberalization and the agrarian question in
Latin America. Access to land, rural poverty, and public action, Cambridge: Oxford
University Press, 246-78.
Chalamwong, Y., &Feder, G. (1988)a. The impact of landownership security: theory and
evidence from Thailand. The World Bank Economic Review, 2(2), 187-204.
Chalamwong, Y., &Feder, G. (1988)b. The economic implications of land documents in
rural Thailand. Agricultural Administration and Extension, 29(2), 123-133.
Chamberlin, J. & Ricker-Gilbert, J. (2015). What are the Drivers of Rural Land Rental
Markets in sub-Saharan Africa, and how do they Impact Household Welfare?
Evidence from Malawi and Zambia. Paper presented at the 29th International
Conference of Agricultural Economics.
Deininger, Klaus, and SongqingJin. 2008. Land Sales and Rental Markets in Transition:
Evidence from Rural Vietnam. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (70): 67-
101.
Deininger, K., Jin, S., &Nagarajan, H. K. (2008). Efficiency and equity impacts of rural land
rental restrictions: Evidence from India. European Economic Review, 52(5), 892-
918.
De Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M., &Sadoulet, E. (1991). Peasant household behaviour with
missing markets: some paradoxes explained. The Economic Journal, 101(409),
1400-1417.
Do, Quy-Toan, and Lakshmi Lyer. 2008. "Land Titling and Rural Transition in Vietnam."
Economic Development and Cultural Change 56 (3): 531-79.
Echenique, J., & Rolando, N. (1991). Tierras de Parceleros: ¿DondeEstán?",Agraria:
Santiago, Chile.
Eswaran, Mukesh, and Ashok Kotwal. (1985). A Theory of Contractual Structure in
Agriculture. American Economic Review 75 (3): 352-67.
ii