Page 164 -
P. 164

โครงการรวบรวมและจัดทําวารสารอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์





                     Tarchi’s  study  (2010)  explored  the  relationship  between  prior  knowledge  and

            reading comprehension of informative texts. The participants were 131 students in grade 7
            in 5 secondary schools in Florence, Italy. They were assessed on different components of

            reading comprehension with a main focus on prior knowledge. They were asked to read
            two passages, science and history, and answer 14 opened-ended and multiple choices

            questions. The results showed that the reader’s prior knowledge had an impact on the
            reader’s comprehension directly and indirectly.



            Methodology


                     This qualitative study employed a method of content analysis (Berg, 2004; Coffey
            and Atkinson, 1996; Strauss and Corbin, 1983). Based on the theoretical framework regarding

            types of idioms (Fernando, 1996; Makkai, 1972), the f rst part aimed to investigate the common
            linguistic types of English idioms used in the editorial columns. 250 pieces of the editorial

            columns (each of with was approximately 500-600 words) were gained from both two major
            English newspapers. Idioms from these editorial columns of these English newspapers were

            identif ed based on the major types classif ed by the two frameworks of idioms employed
            in this study: the semantic framework (Fernando, 1996) and the framework of grammatical

            construction ( Makkai, 1972).

                     The second part of the study aimed to examine the students’ abilities and perceptions
            about English idioms. The instruments used in this part were a questionnaire, three reading

            comprehension tests, and a semi-structured interview. A questionnaire was f rst administered
            to the students to gain their personal information. Next, Reading Comprehension Test 1

            (testing items at sentence level without context), Reading Comprehension Test 2 (testing
            items as the excerpts from editorial columns), and Reading Comprehension Test 3 (Testing

            items of the texts with contexts of simple language created by a researcher) were given
            to the students. The 20 idioms included in these testing items were purposively selected to

            cover all classif ed types. Students were allowed to complete the questionnaire and the
            three reading comprehension tests on their own without time limit. However, they were

            instructed not to look up the meaning of the idiomatic expressions in a dictionary. After




           156  วารสารมนุษยศาสตร์  ปีที่ 18 ฉบับที่ 1 พ.ศ. 2554
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169