Page 13 -
P. 13

โครงการหนังสืออิเล็กทรอนิกส์ด้านการเกษตร เฉลิมพระเกียรติพระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว






                         These  land-use changes have  important ecological implications.  While the government
                  has heavily invested in improving agricultural infrastructure within irrigated areas, so that they
                  are suitable  for farming,  these areas  have been used  for non-agricultural  purposes, such as
                  housing, factories, resorts, golf courses, and roads. This is essentially a loss of fertile farmland. On
                  the other hand, steep and mountainous areas have been cultivated for growing corn for animal
                  feed, rubber, and oil palm, without conserving soil and water resources and improving soil quality.
                  This  has often resulted in soil  erosion and landslides. Such practices are  obviously against the
                  basic principle of sustainable agricultural land use.

                         In terms of land tenure, even though various government agencies have implemented
                  policies and measures to redistribute land ownership, they have so far been able to provide only
                  43.2 million rais of land to 2.7 million farmers. There are still 421,321 farmers who are registered
                  as those without land ownership and 403,321 farmers who are registered as landless. In terms of
                  land tenancy, a total area of 29 milllionrais are rented to farmers, accounting for about 20 percent
                  of the total agricultural land, despite that the government still controls land rental for farming.

                         Due to climate change, the frequent occurrence of floods and droughts continue to affect
                  agricultural land use, particularly in terms of water shortage for agricultural production. Currently
                  there is a shortage of about 48,961 million cubic meters.

                         As for managing farmland, Thai farmers are well aware in preventing deterioration of soil
                  quality, as they continue to improve the soil by using both chemical and organic fertilizers. They
                  generally allow government agencies to set up land and water conservation systems. They also
                  grow vetiver grass by themselves, as well as investing in building wells on their land. They also
                  participate in  the government’s large-scale farmland projects to reduce costs and increase
                  revenues. A key challenge is how to reduce the areas for growing crops that continue to have
                  lower prices.  This is a key issue that the government has to campaign for. More than 53.1 percent
                  of famers constantly face natural disasters, especially floods and droughts. Even though only a
                  small number of farmers say they plan to sell their agricultural land, the research found empirical
                  evidence showing that a number of farmers in the surveyed provinces had sold their land for non-
                  agricultural activities. Another problem is that as many as 78 percent of the farmers have high
                  debt, which is against the basic five principles mentioned earlier.

                         The problems in managing agricultural land in Thailand cover a wide range of complicated
                  and complex issues, including land-use problems, land tenure problems, productivity problems,
                  and loss of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses, deterioration of soil quality and ecosystems,
                  floods and droughts. These problems all affect the quality of life of famers directly.

                         Such problems can be attributed to several factors, including population growth,
                  economic expansion, public policies in terms of spatial development and agricultural production,
                  climate change, land  deterioration, prices  of agricultural products,  farmers’ income,  lack of
                  national land use plans, lack of organizations that monitor and control agricultural land, lack of
                  measures  that support agricultural  land use,  inadequate  information systems for efficient
                  agricultural production. As such, management of agricultural land in Thailand has not aligned with
                  the basic five principles mentioned earlier.



                                                                 ãǰ
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18