Page 56 -
P. 56

โครงการรวบรวมและจัดทําเอกสารวารสารอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์


                                                           45

               that they already recognized the risk of predation as presented by loud speakers, the responses of
               birds were compared using statistical t-test analysis.

                     Primary Responses
                     Distress calls of the White-vented myna made alerted the Common myna to the possible
               presence of danger. The Common myna responded by stretching the neck and turning the head

               quickly in the first period. The latent time of neck stretching and head turning of birds were treated
               as a control. Neck stretching responses to the distress calls were not significantly different (P = 0.575),
               but the alarm calls were significantly different (P < 0.01) and the pre-flight calls were significantly
               different (P < 0.01).  Head turning responses to the distress calls were not significantly different (P =
               0.711), but  the  alarm calls  were  significantly  different  (P  <  0.01)  and  the  pre-flight  calls  were
               significantly different (P < 0.01). The results showed that the Common myna responded to the
               distress calls of the White-vented myna in the same way as the calls of their own species. There may

               have been a bit of a delay when tested with alarm and pre-flight calls (Table 2).

               Table 2  Responses of Common myna in each stimuli.

                                                                 Latent time (s)

                   Behaviours        Sounds           Treatment         SD     Control     SD        P
                                                        (n=10)                 (n=10)
                                   Distress calls       1.553          0.740    1.373     0.666     0.575

                Neck stretching    Alarm calls          5.244          4.134    1.285     0.963     0.009
                                  Pre-flight calls      4.694          3.226    1.656     0.810     0.010

                                   Distress calls       3.630          1.393    3.404     1.290     0.711

                  Head turning     Alarm calls          9.843          7.691    2.526     1.035     0.008
                                  Pre-flight calls      8.411          5.621    2.866     2.313     0.010


                     The latent time of neck stretching and head turning were treated in the White-vented myna
               as a control. Neck stretching that was in response to the distress calls was not significantly different
               (P = 0.569), the alarm calls was not significantly different (P = 0.493), but the pre-flight calls were
               significantly different (P < 0.01). Head turning in response to the distress calls were not significantly
               different (P = 0.451), the alarm calls were not significantly different (P = 0.141), but the pre-flight calls
               were significantly different (P < 0.01). The results showed that White-vented myna responded to the
               distress and alarm calls of the Common myna as same as their own species, but they may have a

               bit of a delay while tested with pre-flight calls (Table 3).

                     Secondary Responses
                     Both myna species exhibited the same pattern of behaviour when they received the distress
               calls. Most of them immediately flew to other areas. The structures of distress calls of both species
               had high similarity and the flying responses were similar in both species. In terms of distress call





               วารสารสัตว์ป่าเมืองไทย ปีที่ 25 1 พ.ศ. 2561                Journal of Wildlife in Thailand Vol. 25, 2018
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61